On the Articles: Article XIX

The Fourth Sunday after Trinity

O GOD, the protector of all that trust in thee, without whom nothing is strong, nothing is holy: Increase and multiply upon us thy mercy; that, thou being our ruler and guide, we may so pass through things temporal, that we finally lose not the things eternal. Grant this, O heavenly Father, for Jesus Christ’s sake our Lord. Amen.

XIX. Of the Church
THE visible Church of Christ is a congregation of faithful men, in the which the pure Word of God is preached, and the Sacraments be duly ministered according to Christ’s ordinance in all those things that of necessity are requisite to the same.
As the Church of Jerusalem, Alexandria, and Antioch, have erred; so also the Church of Rome hath erred, not only in their living and manner of Ceremonies, but also in matters of Faith.

After having spent a great deal of time arguing for the nature of God, the Trinity and Christ, and then our relation to God in terms of salvation, the Articles of Religion turn to the Church, beginning by setting out a clear ecclesiology of the meaning of the Church.

For some when they speak of the Church, they speak of an invisible Church, composed of the body of all believers. Yet there is a subset of that, the visible Church, the bride of Christ, which Christ ordained when he said to his Apostles “on this rock I will build my church,” (St Mt 16. 18b), and birthed at Pentecost by the Holy Spirit. To those for whom there is a visible Church, there is no problem with accepting also an invisible church, though for most the term body of believers would be preferred as ‘invisible church’ is for many a contradiction in terms. However, for many Protestants, they reject any notion of a visible Church instituted by Christ himself, and so their view finds the idea of a visible Church incompatible with their invisible church. This Article begins by clearly stating that for Anglicans, we believe in the visible Church, indeed as the thrust of the English Reformation was to maintain that the English Church is and has always been a part of Christ’s One, Holy, Apostolic and Catholic Church.

In making this claim, the Article goes further to define what distinguishes Christ’s Church from the invisible Church which includes the whole body of believers who profess a saving faith. It lists three general criteria for the Church: the congregation of the faithful, the teaching of God’s Word, and the administration of Christ’s sacraments.

The first criterion is that the Church is, “a congregation of faithful men.” This does not mean to suggest faithful to the Church itself as an institution, but rather faithfulness to Christ. These must be believers, and orthodox believers.

The second criterion is that the Church is a place, “in which the pure Word of God is preached.” Article VI placed a strong emphasis on the Holy Scriptures as containing all things necessary for salvation, in contrast with Rome which taught that the Church had authority outside of Scripture and equal to Scripture to require other dogmas to be accepted as necessary for salvation. It also carries with it the same connotation as faithful in the first criterion: the people cannot be faithful unless the Scriptures are faithfully explained to them. Here the term pure suggests that the Church can err by impurely teaching the Scriptures, something certainly in need of noting in modern times where attempts are made to justify secular practices and mores by twisting Scripture in ways in which it has never been understood and oftentimes contravenes its plain meaning.

The third criterion is that the Church is a place where, “the Sacraments be duly ministered according to Christ’s ordinances.” This makes reference to some later Articles which name Holy Baptism and the Holy Eucharist as the only two sacraments ordained by Christ.

While not a direct criterion, there is a fourth clause in the Article which says, “in all those things necessary and requisite of the same.” This is a reference to the three-fold order of ministry which Cranmer refers to in later articles where it makes clear that only ordained persons may administer the sacraments and preach God’s words.

Taking these four together, they establish a clear pattern. The Church is found where-ever the orthodox faith is professed, God’s Word is faithfully preached, Christ’s sacraments are administered, chiefly meaning Holy Baptism and the Holy Eucharist, and the threefold order of ministry of bishops, priests and deacons is maintained. If this sounds familiar, it is because it has previously been referred to several times on this blog, both as referring to the goal of the English Reformation as well as through later documents such as the Canadian Solemn Declaration of 1893 and the Lambeth Quadrilateral, each of which refer to those four points.

While these four goals can be seen as running throughout the Articles and throughout the writings of Cranmer, the Book of Common Prayer and the English Divines, this is certainly one place, in the Formularies, which the point can be made no more clearly.

The Article itself concludes by pointing out that the ancient patriarchates have erred in matters of faith and ceremonies. It is far easier to see what is meant by this in relation to Rome as several other Articles address Roman errors. Indeed, this also goes back to the reason why Protestants developed their view of the invisible Church, as prior to the disunion of East and West there was very clearly a united visible Church ordained by Christ, and even after that disunion, most people generally viewed the other as being schismatic and thus there was still only one Church. Protestants needed a way to justify their legitimacy in opposition to the visible Church which traced its lineage back to the time of the Apostles. This again reinforces their need to reject the concept of a visible Church and put forward the notion of an invisible Church.

While there is nowhere else in the Articles a clear list of which errors this Article is referring to, there are many known errors into which those sees had historically fallen. At various times, Eastern Sees were controlled by Arians, and in Rome Pope Honorius I had been anathematized for the heresy of Monothelitism in the 7th century. This Article was composed while the Roman Council of Trent was ongoing, and one important point at Trent was that its decrees were declared to not be infallible and dogmatic decrees of the past hundred years were also opened for question. This point may have been to reinforce the fallibility of the Church again primarily as a challenge to Rome’s more common claims to infallibility (though not Papal infallibility, a doctrine not yet proclaimed in the 16th century and which was not articulated until the 19th century).

While interpretation of this Article has varied over time, the stance of the visible Church and a willingness to accept the idea of an invisible Church claimed by Protestants now generally being accepted, it makes continued important statements about knowledge of where the visible Church is, and Anglicanism’s role in maintaining the purity of the Christ’s Catholic Church in the Realm of England (and lands subsequently reached by English missionaries).

On the Articles: Article VIII

The Octave Day of Easter

ALMIGHTY Father, who hast given thine only a Son to die for our sins, and to rise again for our justification: Grant us so to put away the leaven of malice and wickedness, that we may alway serve thee in pureness of living and truth; through the merits of the same thy Son Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

Easter

O GOD, who makest us glad with the yearly remembrance of the resurrection from the dead of thy only Son Jesus Christ: Grant that we who celebrate this Paschal feast may die daily unto sin, and live with him evermore in the glory of his endless life; through the same Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

VIII. Of the Creeds
The Three Creeds, Nicene Creed, Athanasius’s Creed, and that which is commonly called the Apostles’ Creed, ought thoroughly to be received and believed: for they may be proved by most certain warrants of holy Scripture.

 While many of the more mainline reformation churches on the continent did not express objection to the creeds, their understanding and legitimacy had been, to some degree, put into question particularly by more radical reformers. Rome itself had upheld them by virtue of Holy Tradition, which was quite suspect by most continental reformers. In the Christian East, the Athanasian creed had never been accepted, and the Apostle’s creed had never been used.

Article VIII declares all three to be valid and received by the Church in England, and  goes further in stating why: because they may be proved by Holy Scripture. No longer do we accept the Nicene Creed solely because it was the creed of the early Church Councils, but also because the doctrine set forth in the creed is in agreement with Holy Scripture. Going back to Article VI, this emphasis on the prima sciptura mindset of the English Reformation makes it clear that in its having the highest form of divine inspiration, the Holy Scriptures remain at all times the rule and standard by which every other tradition of the Church is judged, even while in their symbiotic relationship it is through Holy Tradition by which we know the right interpretation of Holy Scripture. To quote Fr Kenneth Ross, it is the responsibility of, “the Church to teach and the Bible to prove.”

This also helps to explain why all three creeds are accepted, and in particular the Athanasian Creed, which was not written by St Athanasius the Great but rather was attributed to him, leading many in the East to reject it as inauthentic. Because of its still widespread use throughout the West, and because its doctrines were Biblically sound, the Church continued to accept the validity of the Creed as a doctrinal statement.

Article VIII speaks well to the idea of the symbiosis between the role of Holy Scripture as the rule of faith against which all else is judged, and also the reality that Holy Scripture itself is not always easily understood and Holy Tradition, and in this case the Creeds, help us to rightly understand Holy Scripture. St Vincent of Lerins once noted that we must take care to, “cleave to antiquity, which cannot now be led astray by any deceit of novelty.” The Nicene Creed cannot accept some new heresy because its words and meaning were fixed in antiquity; in the same way the ancient authors help us to interpret Scripture because they cannot be accepted by some new novelty in that they are no longer among the living to debate the merits of new interpretations.

It is particularly important to affirm this fact in modern times when the understanding of the Creeds is becoming more complicated. Some Anglicans simply cannot profess the truths they proclaim, either refusing to say the Creed or omitting portions of it which they find distasteful. This practice goes completely against the Anglican tradition, in which they are not merely proclaimed, but as the Article states are, “thoroughly to be received and believed.”

When an individual has a problem accepting or believing some particular aspect of the Creed, which is a sufficient statement of the Christian faith, the issue is not with the Creed but rather with their lack of education to understand the Creed and its meaning. The Creeds themselves speak to something unchanging: God and his historical interactions with mankind, particularly through the incarnation of Christ Jesus. In what way would the passage of time change the nature of God or the historicity of the incarnation? Even two thousand years is a small passage of time for the eternal and immutable God. The Scriptures themselves are presented as timeless and unchanging in their message; and in a similar way the Creeds must be understood. They speak to a particular Truth about God.

In our modern society, where there are concerns or unbelief, there are two solutions. The first is prayer, “I believe; help my unbelief!” (St Mk 9. 24b). The second is education. Particularly with many children breaking with faith during their teenage years—a time critical to Christian formation among young people—they may not have the foundations of understanding often assumed for adults who profess the Christian faith. Greater opportunities need to be made available to address these critical gaps in understanding of Christian doctrine and faith.

While that solution is there, Article VIII remains as a reminder of why it is needed. As Anglicans, we profess the historic faith in Christ, and will for all times as a matter of our inherent Anglican identity.

On the Articles: Article V

The Fourth Sunday in Lent

GRANT, we beseech thee, Almighty God, that we, who for our evil deeds do worthily deserve to be punished, by the comfort of thy grace may mercifully be relieved; through our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. Amen.

Lent

ALMIGHTY and everlasting God, who hatest nothing that thou hast made, and dost forgive the sins of all them that are penitent: Create and make in us new and contrite hearts, that we worthily lamenting our sins, and acknowledging our wretchedness, may obtain of thee, the God of all mercy, perfect remission and forgiveness; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

V. Of the Holy Ghost
The Holy Ghost, proceeding from the Father and the Son, is of one substance, majesty, and glory, with the Father and the Son, very and eternal God.

Given the subject matter of Article IV, Of the Resurrection of Christ, the discussion of that Article will be deferred a few weeks and this week will proceed with Article V.

Article V is perhaps one of the more controversial of the Articles, if only because of its inclusion of the filioque (Latin for and from the Son) clause added by the Roman Catholic Church to the Nicene Creed. Its inclusion here is a historic artefact and reminder of the influence that the Roman Catholic Church had on the development of doctrines within the English Church from the 7th through 15th centuries.

The filioque itself originates in the 6th century in Spain, generally thought to be an attempt to combat Arianism, however it was originally rejected by Rome which said no one held the authority to add to the Catholic Creeds. The Holy Roman Emperor Charlemagne adapted it for use throughout the Holy Roman Empire, however, and by the early 11th century it had become accepted by Rome, contributing to the eventual disunity of the Great Schism between East and West in 1054.

As an historic artefact, it is a reminder that our Anglican heritage is thoroughly Western in thought, and influenced primarily by Western thinkers, most of whom are associated today with the Roman Catholic Church, though it should be noted the protoscholastic St Anselm of Canterbury was also an 11th century defender of this doctrine, which can be traced to the teachings of St Augustine of Hippo.

Its inclusion in the filioque does present one minor and interesting point in that one of the arguments against it is that of authority: the filioque has never been received in the East, meaning the West, or more accurately one part of the West, had no authority on its own to altar the Nicene Creed on its own. In this case, however, its inclusion in the subordinate Thirty-nine Articles of religion does not present a problem of authority, leaving it solely to the theological debate over the validity of double-procession.

That debate is in and of itself one which could take several books to work through, and is a more worthy subject for a doctoral dissertation than a brief blog post. Instead, the emphasis in discussing this Article will be on the second interesting historic point about this Article, namely that it did not always exist.

Throughout the history of the Church of England, there were a number of versions of the Articles of Religion published, sometimes with more and sometimes with fewer than 39 articles. This particular article was not included in the 1553 version of the Articles, but was added in the revision of 1563. It is not a part of the Augsburg Confessions either, from which the first three Articles of Religion borrow significantly. Why was it viewed as essential to include?

There is no other Article devoted to the third person of the Trinity, despite there having been articles devoted specifically to the Father and to the Son. By including an article for the Holy Spirit, it matches the more trinitarian format of the Creeds from which the patterns of modification seen in the first three Articles of Religion had their basis.

Beyond that, it is simply recognizing the importance of the Holy Spirit in enabling the Christian life. It is through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit by which we proceed in our faith, and are able  in any way to live the life Christ commanded of us. The Article itself does not provide a complicated statement on the role and work of the Holy Spirit, but a simple statement highlights that simple truth. The Holy Spirit is a person of the Trinity and the means by which we are made alive in God.

This statement is also extremely Catholic, with respect to the acknowledged importance of the work of the Holy Spirit in the Early Church. The Apostolic Age bears witness to the importance of the Holy Spirit, and countless works of the Fathers refer to the role, power and witness of the Holy Spirit in the lives of Christians. It reminds us of the rootedness of the Anglican tradition in the faith of the early Church.

The Articles so far speak very little of something distinctive of Anglicanism, but rather broadly speak to a reiteration of credal, Catholic and Christian beliefs. With modern renewal of charismatic movements among all Christian traditions and denominations, affirmation that the Holy Spirit is an integral and continuing person of the Trinity and the person through whom our Christian lives are lived out becomes all the more relevant to modern Anglicans.

On Anticipation

The Third Sunday in Advent

O LORD Jesu Christ, who at thy first coming didst send thy messenger to prepare thy way before thee: Grant that the ministers and stewards of thy mysteries may likewise so prepare and make ready thy way, by turning the hearts of the disobedient to the wisdom of the just, that at thy second coming to judge the world we may be found an acceptable people in thy sight; who livest and reignest with the Father and the Holy Spirit, ever one God, world without end. Amen.

Advent

ALMIGHTY God, give us grace that we may cast away the works of darkness, and put upon us the armour of light, now in the time of this mortal life, in which thy Son Jesus Christ came to visit us in great humility; that in the last day, when he shall come again in his glorious Majesty, to judge both the quick and the dead, we may rise to the life immortal; through him who liveth and reigneth with thee and the Holy Spirit, now and ever. Amen.

 For many people, even Christians, this is not the season of Advent, but rather Christmas. This is a cultural rather than Christian influence. It is a season of peace and joy. That peace and joy are often found not in reflecting upon Holy Scripture, but rather in the gathering of family, sharing veritable feats with friends and family and the exchange of gifts. This is understandable, because even those who try to oppose the secularization and commercialization of the Christmas do so from the perspective that, “the reason for the season,” is exclusively found in the birth of Christ.

If you ask most Christians why that is important, they would probably focus on the atonement. The logic effectively becomes we celebrate Christ’s birth so that he can die for our sins and bring us repentance. This is entirely understandable.  In the Nicene Creed, it describes the incarnation thus, “For us men and for our salvation he came down from heaven...” There is nothing untrue in the logic that the reason for the incarnation is salvation, though it perhaps misses the point. “The reason for the season,” argument doesn’t fully express the issue because it points to the wrong season. We aren’t yet in the season of Christmas, but in Advent.

Advent is derived from Latin and means coming. It is the season prior to Christmas in which we anticipate Christ’s coming. That can be a confusing statement and leads to another issue. It is simple for many people to say they are anticipating Christmas, but that is not really what we are meant to anticipate, even though the fact that we think of the Nativity in terms of a past historical event, which is therefore hard to anticipate. This leads to the anticipation of Christmas as a holiday rather than Christmas as a holy day.

When we say Christ’s coming, though, there is a three-fold meaning to it. It means first and foremost his coming in history, celebrated at Christ’s mass, the feast of the Nativity. It also refers to our anticipation of how he continues to come in the sacrament of the Eucharist. Finally, it reminds us to anticipate his coming again on the last day.

When looking at Advent in this traditional three-fold lens, it is much easier to see how we are called to anticipate Christ’s coming. It still is not the complete picture, however!

We anticipate his coming in history in and of itself, and not simply for its final victory in Christ’s crucifixion. His incarnation in and of itself is worthy to be recognized for the change it brought to our understanding of God.

St Athanasius the Great wrote, “For the Son of God became man so that we might become God.”   This statement requires a little bit of unpacking. Perhaps a bit lengthier way of expressing this sentiment, that more clearly articulates its meaning, would be to say, “The Son of God, fully God, became Man, fully man apart from sin, in order to make clear the nature of God to Man, that Man might become more God-like.” In other words, St Athanasius is not referring to some kind of apotheosis but rather is suggesting that it is through the incarnation that we become more like we were meant to be, having been created originally in the image and likeness  of God.

Anyone who is familiar with the Old Testament would recognize the biographical elements of it. Through different authors, we are given a picture of God’s nature. His mercy, his judgement, his love for mankind and particularly for his chosen people. We see times in which God was close to particular people. Great saints of the Old Testament like Abraham and Moses were counted as friends of God. In Exodus, Moses spends so much time conversing with God that his face glows (Ex 34. 29) and yet through this friendship, Moses continues to refer to God using the same style as any other Jew would. God also tells Moses that no man may see God’s face for they would die (Ex 33. 20). Moses was a friend to God but there were limits to how well Moses could know God.

Yet today, almost every Christian recites the Lord’s Prayer in which God is given the far more intimate address of Father. It is through Christ’s incarnation that we have come to know God. Colossians tells us that Christ, “is the image of the invisible God,” (Col 1. 15) and through him we can now see not just the Lord, but our Father. Whereas the Old Testament might be an objective historical account of God’s nature, the New Testament presents us with an intimate and personal portrait of who God is and his love for us. Indeed, to paraphrase CS Lewis, it is through the incarnation that we go from being creatures of God, looking upon him from afar, to being children of God, adopted into his family.

This concept that we have become adopted into God’s family is at the heart of the connection between Christ’s historic coming and how he continues to come. It is in that adoption that we now do not simply look into God from afar, but intimately participate in life with God. In his first epistle, St John tells us that he testifies to Christ’s life, in which the Father was made manifest, so that we might share in this intimate fellowship and participation with our fellow believers and with the Father (I St Jn 1. 1-3)! St Paul then uses the same language of intimate fellowship, communion and participation when he asks of the Eucharist, “The cup of blessing that we bless, is it not a participation in the blood of Christ? The bread that we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ?” (I Cor 10. 16).

We continue to anticipate his coming because just as the incarnation was a sign promised by the Father (Isa 7. 14) for Christ’s incarnation, the sign of his grace reminds us that he continues to love and support us and he seeks to prepare us for his coming again on the last day. It is by grace that we will be judged righteous on that last day, and so again that same sign which he gives to us in the Eucharist is a reminder of is coming for us in the future. Joy in advent is reflection that by his continued coming, by the grace he imparts, we are able to anticipate his coming again with joy and not with dread.

That is the true reason for the season.

On the Marks of the Church

Remembrance Sunday

ALMIGHTY Lord and everlasting Father, who wouldest have the kingdoms of the world become the kingdom of thy Son Jesus Christ: Bestow thy blessing, we beseech thee, upon all who labour for peace and righteousness among the nations, that the day may be hastened when war shall be no more, and thou shalt take the nations for thine inheritance; through the same Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

The Octave Day of All Saints

O ALMIGHTY God, who hast knit together thine elect in one communion and fellowship, in the mystical body of thy Son Christ our Lord: Grant us grace so to follow thy blessed Saints in all virtuous and godly living, that we may come to those unspeakable joys, which thou hast prepared for them that unfeignedly love thee; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

The Twenty-Third Sunday after Trinity

O GOD, our refuge and strength, who art the author of all godliness: Be ready, we beseech thee, to hear the devout prayers of thy Church; and grant that those things which we ask faithfully we may obtain effectually; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

Each Sunday, the Nicene Creed is recited and contained within it is the line “And I believe One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.” This is known as the four marks of the Church, four characteristics which help to define what the church is. Some of these characteristics, such as what it means to be Catholic, have already been addressed in part previously, but taken together as the marks, they paint a particular picture of what we as Christians profess to believe in.

We profess belief in one church. There are a number of points that can be taken from this. First and foremost, it must be remembered that Christ ordained one visible Church. As Christ said, “on this rock I will build my Church.” St Paul describes it saying the Church is:

“built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus himself being the cornerstone, in whom the whole structure, being joined together, grows into a holy temple in the Lord. In him you also are being built together into a dwelling place for God by the Spirit,” (Eph 2. 20-22).

When we speak of the Church, it is a reference not just to the collection of all those who confess the name of Christ, but a reference to the institution Christ created by which his Apostles were sent out to the world. The goal of the Church is made clear in both Christ’s Great Commission (St Mt 28. 16-20) and his prayer that we be one (St Jn 17. 11). It is clear also that this distinguishes the Church from God’s people in the Old Testament. The Church is one for all people, as the words of the Nunc dimittis say, “my eyes have seen your salvation that you have prepared in the presence of all peoples, a light for revelation to the Gentiles, and for glory to your people Israel,” (St Lk 2. 30-32).  Christ invites all people to him and offers the graces invested in his Church to all people. One Church, created by Christ for all people.

The second mark of the Church is that it is Holy, and it presents an interesting duality. To be Holy is to be set apart. It is clear from Holy Scripture that all Christians are called to a life that is set apart, and it is also true that the Church itself is set apart because its doctrines come not from the world, but from the teachings of Christ handed down through the Apostles. In I Timothy, St Paul exhorts Timothy to guard the deposit of true teaching that has been entrusted to him (I Tim 6. 20). This establishes an interesting duality for the Church, in that it is both holy and set apart and that it is being transformed by God’s grace and made holy, just as those who are in Christ are  holy and are being made holy by his grace.

It is perhaps easier to look at this concept in the personal sense, in that it is easier to see how as Christians we are made holy, and yet that does not prevent us from sinning. Yet still, by God’s grace, we are continually transformed and sanctified (Heb 10. 14). It is no different when speaking of the Church which, while established by Christ, is lived in and maintained by those of us who fall short. It was set apart and made holy, yet it is by God’s grace that it is continually being made holy.

The third mark of the Church is that it is Catholic. Indeed, in the Apostle’s creed only the middle two marks (holy and Catholic) are mentioned. Catholicity here is sometimes, particularly among protestants, viewed as meaning universal, but it speaks to a greater truth relating to Christ’s foundation of the Church as being for all people, not that all people are universally the Church. This speaks to those teachings and doctrines which were received and held by Christ’s Church east and west when it truly was one in unity of faith, word, Sacrament and ministry.

These principles are an expanded core of Christian unity today and ought to be considered universal, though they are not. It remains in that sense that the mark of Catholicity of the Church is also a mark of universality. Holy Scripture was not made for any one person, but the canon of Scripture was made for all people, to draw them all to Christ. Similarly the Sacraments, chiefly speaking here of Holy Baptism and the Eucharist, initiate all people and feed all people in their faith.

The final mark of the Church is that it is Apostolic. The office of Apostle is now defunct, but the meaning of the word remains critical to all Christians. It again speaks to multiple meanings. First and foremost it informs the idea of maintaining that which is Catholic. Christ established his Church and that Church is the Catholic Church. He ordained his Apostles to pass on what they had received. Today bishops hold that role as guardians of the faith and Apostolic Succession refers more than to simply being able to trace a line of bishops back to the first century, but rather speaks to that maintenance of the faith, word, sacrament and ministry of that Church.

Fr Michael McKinnon summarizes this sentiment saying it refers to:

Those communions or fellowships of the once undivided Catholic church who have maintained the one canon of Scripture, the one faith, articulated in the creeds and councils of the Church, the one Sacramental life, emphasizing the sacraments of Baptism, and being born to new life, and the Supper of the Lord, and being nourished in new life, and the one apostolic ministry, with the threefold order of bishops, priests and deacons, and which taken together comprise the once undivided Catholic Church.

The emphasis in his statement is on the maintenance of those beliefs and practices, with an emphasis on the threefold order of ministry as the chief method of maintaining those beliefs.

These marks of the Church teach provide a valuable statement about our faith, and rightly so as an integral component of the Nicene Creed, itself and sufficient statement of Christian belief. When we recite the Creed, fully understanding what is meant by One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, and further when we seek to live out our faith in that Church, we are responding to and answering Christ’s prayer that we be one.