On the Three Streams of Anglicanism

The Epiphany of our Lord

O GOD, who by the leading of a star didst manifest thy only-begotten Son to the Gentiles: Mercifully grant, that we, who know thee now by faith, may be led onward through this earthly life, until we see the vision of thy heavenly glory; through the same thy Son Jesus Christ, who with thee and the Holy Ghost liveth and reigneth, one God, world without end. Amen.

The First Sunday after Epiphany in Octave

O LORD, we beseech thee mercifully to receive the prayers of thy people which call upon thee; and grant that they may both perceive and know what things they ought to do, and also may have grace and power faithfully to fulfil the same; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

Just as there are multiple forms of Churchmanship among Anglicans, there have developed over times a number of primary forms of characterizing Anglicans themselves outside of the Broad Church/liberal or conservative/traditionalist dichotomies which can realistically be applied to any Christian tradition or denomination. Among Anglicans, there are generally viewed to be Evangelical, Catholic and Spirit-filled or Charismatic Anglicans.

Evangelical Anglicans hold to the supreme authority of Holy Scripture, and much like evangelical protestants, hold that all teachings and beliefs are to be tested against the teachings of Holy Scripture alone.

Catholic Anglicans tend to hold their authority in the universality of the early Church. The Catholic creeds, the ecumenical councils of the Church prior to its division, and the writings of the early church fathers are all held to be of certain levels of authority, though ultimately they are never held in opposition to the Scriptures because their acceptance has always been predicated on their apostolic witness which is the same witness recorded in the Holy Scriptures.

It should be noted at this point that Evangelical and Catholic Anglicans should not be confused with Anglo-Catholics or Low Churchmen or High Churchmen. These labels refer more to theology and view rather than specifically to liturgical and ritual preferences. It is entirely possible for there to be an extremely high church evangelical who prefers the use of incense based on its Biblical use rather than its historic use in the Church and ascribes to it a different meaning than might typically be associated with its use from a Catholic viewpoint. Similarly, it is entirely possible to be a Low Churchman Catholic Anglican, who eschews ritual as being unhelpful to personal worship and devotion of God, but who holds a Catholic viewpoint and mind with respect to doctrine and theology, and even other elements of personal piety.

Spirit-filled or Charismatic Anglicans place a greater emphasis on the continuing work of the Holy Spirit in their lives. Such an Anglican is more likely to look to exercise gifts of the Spirit, in contrast to Evangelicals and Catholics who might view the charisms described in the Scriptures as having largely ceased at some point in history. Again this openness to the work of the Holy Spirit does not suggest that the Holy Spirit will over-rule the Scriptures, but rather suggests a different emphasis and lens by which the Scriptures might sometimes be examined or applied.

There is something helpful about these descriptions at times. When they are universally held they can be useful descriptors of theology when two Anglicans meet one another, or perhaps to describe the general trends of a particular parish. Yet the reality is that Anglicanism requires all three.

In order to be Evangelical, you must be Spirit-filled. In order to be Catholic, you must be Spirit-filled. Christ tells us in the Scriptures he will send the Holy Spirit, this coming of the Holy Spirit is recorded in the Acts of the Apostles on the Day of Pentecost, and subsequent to that, a number of the Biblical writers, and especially St Paul, write about the nature of Spiritual gifts and how they are to be exercised. You cannot be an Evangelical Anglican without being Spirit-filled. Similarly, how many of the Fathers of the Church wrote on the importance of the Holy Spirit? The role of the Holy Spirit is prevalent throughout their writings, empowering and strengthening Christians through the ages. Even within the Book of Common Prayer itself, the Holy Spirit’s role is quite evident. It cannot be ignored. To be Catholic, to present one’s own mind as being in line with the mind of the Church, one must be Spirit-filled.

The reverse holds true as well, in that it is not sufficient simply to accept that the Holy Spirit can influence us and empower us, for we are also told in Holy Scripture to be wary of spiritual warfare and evil spirits who would seek to corrupt us. Without the canon of Holy Scripture to test against, it is difficult to maintain orthodoxy when immersed in the Spirit. It is far to easy to claim something as the Spirit’s will when it is at best our own will. It is our Catholicity that similarly informs how we interpret Scripture, and as such prevents us from applying our own desires and opinions to the interpretation of Scripture, reading into it, the technical term for which is eisegesis, our own meanings.

Finally, to be Evangelical you must be Catholic, for that same reason. You cannot hold the Scriptures alone, indeed it is the Catholicity of the Church which upholds the Canon and affirms it. Why is Romans a book of the Bible? Because it was held to be Apostolic and inspired, and was received by the whole Church as such. How is it interpreted rightly? Look to the Father’s of the church and those who have succeeded them in expounding upon and articulating their right beliefs. The reverse holds true as well. You cannot be Catholic without being Evangelical for the same reason. The Canon of Scripture itself, the Bible, is a central part of Catholicity.

These three streams of Anglicanism may hold a certain value as descriptors, but we must never look on them as being separate streams held in tension among one another, but rather three ways of looking towards God’s truth, that emphasize different parts of that truth while not excluding or ignoring any of that truth as seen from other perspectives.

When you ask someone what the purpose of evangelism is, the primary lens through which they view their faith will affect their response. Someone who is Evangelical is more likely to respond in terms of sharing God’s love with others and bringing them to knowledge of that love itself. Someone who is more Catholic minded may not have as enthusiastic a response, simply noting it is part of Christ’s great commission and that we, in faith, continue to evangelize in obedience to him. Someone who is Spirit-filled might similarly respond by discussing the charisms relating to evangelism and how we hold a responsibility to use those gifts.

All three responses are true, but to speak the whole truth, all three must be brought together and much like the Holy Trinity, where we must not distinguish the persons to the point we lose the oneness of God, we must not distinguish these three streams of Anglicanism to the point we lose the wholeness of our faith.